Did the state decide an important Constitutional Double Jeopardy violation that conflicted with another Court and the Supreme Court?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Did the state decide anim portant Constitutional Double Jeopatdy viglahion that Conf \iceed with another Court and the Supreme Court when it determineol that a Lolwee to object anch Catse, the Double Jeopardy Claim before or during trial was waved even though it is closerved and Texas Penal lode 325, td) proibitecd Ate use of more Counts tor the same offense arising out of the Same Criminal eprsede, daring +he same the period, aAAains+ the Same victim ana fesulted ain multiple Punishmenk S e ® vthe sare vislave. J és Const Did the Stare Violate Jason Mubrdds constitutional Due Process Nights wher ix held a hearing without his presence or notification tn court on Apes | i JOIT to make an amendment tohis indictment Six days before trial? \s a «heat to commit bodily injury enough to charge and convict Someone of Aggfavated hssault with a Deadly Weapon without violating Ane Conel and Unusual Oocreine of the Sth Amendment ? > i+ a Due Process Violation to amend or M+er an indictment without noxiking Me Aekendant without leave of Court p without defendant's pce BeNCR in cComre ond without fesub mitthy the indictment back to the grand sary and ski\\ hove the indictment (ead the same but on ly orbmitt the dose *othe jury aherent inorder to try and avoid 5° double Jeo pardy Same element tet ? Did ree court of Appeals errwhen + affiemed Conuitons for Oounts a, 4 and J Mot Violated delendants double Jeopardy Cights* P.. ne Lault of defendant or his wunsel for Failing +o faise an objection to a Double Jeo pataly Wolatien 'M orher to preserve error for CFeview on Aireck appeal ? Q. darial fesets andadelay of [F months constirzure a denial of a Constiturtonal Might toa Speedy trial ? .