Whether arbitrary government intrusion violates the Fourth Amendment by means of unlawful search and seizure without probable cause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : |, IF arbitrary overament intouston violates the foorth a aunérdlnead by means of onlaustal in Eon With ot probable 2, can tha intrusion be vse® fo further goverment intrests by means compelled tam pliance with Semands? 3, Can goverment Use evidlence obtained and tafeoduced attprgl unaonstitutionally +o ahange a convict an GCs > 3, Can qovernmert vse a made up procedure during court proceed in S hat i) not a statute in criminal orcwil procedures, to deny . Qdobstanhal ght se ee FTE habeas pobihoner soffired) “actval prej0ive found inthe Brecht SlendarG ' god. it hall Subsonic and mor jous ettect, is . it Constitehenal error to deny reltet: eb Can a state deny assistance of coensel at faial just ECA c. an aclosed offered compet en cy at a fartta heaang nag early stages 0€ court process t | ts it a vidleton of Due Process if phe Unjred States diGtr'ot Goart or Court of apseals 400m one of Tht me . . cinevits closes the Joor fo potential mee et nr en applicant serves the citerin exteblie’ 9g 70 gaas4@i); S2stQ@) or Soa @) BU) >" 9 OG) tn a tedera| habeas: : | HA , , : (i p29)