Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by errors in his criminal trial and sentencing proceedings

No question identified. : ; QUESTION®) PRESENTED a ad i ol ih ne ‘ | b oe ‘ « ¢ ° Us nite Matin Right toe plans [CidoonV, Wainwright; Strict AV. Washington; U.S. V.Chwonic; Davis V. Alaska; Gra Vayda Aine ThormPsor/, US! HELLY, lneKhavts Wasdhi Vitae; Po LV. Cont Sith V.Liinoiss Bactle: V. Danis RowN, Floves~ 0 ‘\SV. Gonzalez 3 Kane V. Gaveta-Estitta, and Baul ¥. brett] ee Error i Luisa, Seat oval Drounrloontys Doors AT 2, Deol dona y notroontition and Countlo holed (tb ibaa beial71 Fa Uta Vlalifernias Dobbovt V. Florida; SehnwiGor Vt Rusk \ien burger V. Wiesenfeld: CaurPbolLV. LA! US V. Bonzaloz.lo poz /. inl dovntak) Gd tive LA cl} AAD WL (ny ot Tene Is ve Lai Ot 4 tial -t al 7h wdicreaial hint abe 0? OS. V. Ghfonics Rowell V, Macau ZC Had, L$, aiilded in ducer Dy ytoobth owmemobnwl rs, Strate Error oRettacking AcsiWey 0.0 (une ov. ~-4.Did dimialtp dinabow Pico Kote une Dy tre State Tremere dob i fbtone oy bye Pcs of lO yi ab Tanil | eid ond te | jncatce 5 7nta. Witinbaaln”¢ [Birdy ova Fas ay oy: Mata! TL Mois) bait Alaska! LS V Baalow’ Ano Giato V. US? 1 (a8 21 Amurck 5, did on wuctwitony Vow AvP Wet. bctiliphoi inh te haima ik ortin£ y wk PIB ads “USS EXPARTEOWULEND} BAS rR; DiazV. Mav tink? Cicth, Ecadetn, Rib Ayo F uh Tipit Mnpriel vel ve fa lo tod He doa Ls on Fil, | Lama Proliolicoctuclag. daPtuned A@Zon A El CHa MA VV CALTRRLY 2 WS. 7, hic dois Lp i, board Whi dy lated tL rs il Py bul A lp rlbatel counselors t rpowincls a. Sonate