No. 18-6982
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553 28-usc-994 career-offender district-court due-process federal-sentencing guideline-application harmless-error johnson-v-united-states molina-martinez molina-martinez-precedent molina-martinez-v-united-states sentencing-guidelines sentencing-guidelines-error
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing, where due to Guideline application error, the district court incorrectly applied the more severe career offender provision of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, even though the sentence imposed was within the correct range, in light of this Court's ruling in Molina-Martinez v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 1338 (2016)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing due to Guideline application error
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Jerry Walden
Jerry Walden — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent