No. 18-6988
Donald Sanders v. Domingo Uribe, Jr., Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation confrontation-clause cross-examination due-process eyewitness eyewitness-testimony federal-proceedings fundamental-fairness ninth-circuit state-court state-court-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in its decision that the state court reasonably concluded that Petitioner's right to confrontation was not violated by the trial court's refusal to strike the testimony of an eyewitness who declined to answer questions on cross-examination?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in its decision that the state court reasonably concluded that Petitioner’s right to confrontation was not violated by the trial court’s refusal to strike the testimony of an eyewitness who declined to answer questions on cross-examination? I
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent Domingo Uribe, Jr., Warden to respond filed.
2018-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Donald Sanders
Moriah Radin — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Moriah Radin — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner