No. 18-6996

Jonathan R. Curshen v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts certificate-of-appealability due-process equal-protection ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the petitioner denied his substantial rights to access to the courts, due process, and equal protection, when the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied (without an opinion) his request for a certificate of appealability to review an order of the United States District Court which failed to adjudicate a claim of constitutional error presented in a motion to correct petitioner's sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW WAS THE PETITIONER DENIED HIS SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS TO ACCESS TO THE COURTS, DUE PROCESS, AND EQUAL PROTECTION, WHEN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DENIED (WITHOUT AN OPINION) HIS REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY TO REVIEW AN ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WHICH FAILED TO ADJUDICATE A CLAIM OF CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR PRESENTED IN A MOTION TO CORRECT PETITIONER'S SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255? . 7

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-01-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Jonathan R. Curshen
Jonathan R. Curshen — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent