No. 18-6998

George Cleveland, III v. South Carolina

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2018-12-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts bounds-v-smith civil-appeal civil-rights court-of-appeals direct-appeal docket-fee docket-fees due-process in-forma-pauperis indigent-litigant indigent-litigants pro-se-litigation south-carolina
Key Terms:
Environmental Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Bounds v. Smith 430 U.S. 817 97 S.Ct. 1491 (1977) requires the waiver of the docket fee in a civil on direct appeal to Indigent litigants who cannot afford to pay the docket fee in the South Carolina Court of Appeals?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented: After the South Carolina Court of Appeals denied Petitioner Cleveland’s Motion to proceed in forma pauperis under this court’s holding under Bounds v. ‘ Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491 (1977) which holds Indigent Appellant Litigants must be allowed to file direct appeals without prepayment of docket fees. The Supreme Court of South Carolina denied to even review this case despite Petitioner Cleveland citation of Bounds. IBID. The question presented is: 1. Whether Bounds v. Smith 430 U.S. 817 97 S.Ct. 1491 (1977) requires the waiver of the docket fee in a civil on direct appeal to Indigent litigants who cannot afford to pay the docket fee in the South Carolina Court of Appeals? \ 3 (b)

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2019)
2018-10-01
Application (18A336) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 23, 2018.
2018-09-22
Application (18A336) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 24, 2018 to November 23, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

George Cleveland
George Cleveland III — Petitioner