No. 18-6999

John McQueen v. Lynn Fisher

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: circuit-court civil-procedure district-court-errors due-process exceptional-importance exxon-mobil-precedent exxon-mobil-v-saudi-basic federal-courts federal-jurisdiction judicial-review jurisdiction rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine sixth-circuit-errors standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court has subject matter jurisdiction to decide if Rooker-Feldman applies to cases filed in federal court before the state court action has ended

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The District Court has subject matter jurisdiction to decide whether Rooker-Feldman applies to cases filed in federal court before the state Court action has ended. .. The judgment of the sixth circuit and district court conflicts with This Court’s Decision in Exxon Mobil Corp. V. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. 544 U.S. 280(2005). } ; . ii. : THIS CASE PRESENTS A QUESTION OF EXCEPTIONAL IMPORTANCE WARRANTING THIS COURT'S IMMEDIATE RESOLUTION The district as well as the sixth circuit were aware their judgments were Incorrect. They were hoping Mc Queen could not Man or be able to prepare a petition for a writ of certiorari. It’s time This Court Spoke up for its decisions. : The decisions of the district court and the sixth circuit speak for themselves. They were attempting to make sure the errors they created would never be ‘ Corrected. Please read the judgments. ) . » » 4 . » » > » ) . ] . > iii.

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 11, 2019)

Attorneys

John McQueen
John McQueen — Petitioner