No. 18-7013

In Re E. Edward Zimmermann

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-12-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: commerce-clause congress constitution constitutional-interpretation federal-authority federal-government interstate-commerce intrastate-commerce legislative-interpretation regulatory-scope state-governments state-powers
Key Terms:
LaborRelations
Latest Conference: 2019-03-29 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Article One of The Constitution of The United States (The Constitution) say, 'We the people grant to ... The Congress of the United States the constitutional authority to regulate commerce?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does Article One of The Constitution of The United States (The Constitution) say, “We the people grant to ... The Congress of the United States the constitutional authority to regulate commerce”? Or, Does Article One of, The Constitution, “We the people grant to ... State government and illegitimate Federal government the constitutional authority to regulate commerce”? 3, * 1 For the purposes of this litigate commerce is defined as all interstate and intrastate commerce. 2 For the purposes of this litigation illegitimate Federal government is defined as Federal government that is currently regulating commerce, that is not The Congress of The United States (The Congress) nor, is it a constitutionally sound regulatory arm of The Congress. ii

Docket Entries

2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-11
Petitioner complied with order of February 19, 2019.
2019-02-19
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 12, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2018-12-10
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)

Attorneys

E. Edward Zimmerman
E. Edward Zimmerman — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent