No. 18-7016

Tuad Damonn Washington v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky civil-rights constitutional-claims discrimination due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment jury-selection peremptory-strikes racial-discrimination sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-district-court-assessment-was-debatable

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Would jurists of reason find the district courts assesment of Washington's constitutional cdaims debatable or wrong; or that the petition should have been resolved in a different manner; or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve to proceed further? 2. Was the state court's decision based on an unreasonable determination of the: facts in light of.the recordi.béfore: the court? 3. Should a comparative analysis been uséd to ferret out discri. mination in the prosecutdon's explanation for its peremptory strikes? . 4. Was Washington's VI and XIV Constitutional Amendment Rights. violated as determined in Batson vKentucky 476 U.S. 79 (1986)? woe te :

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-03-07
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Tuad Damonn Washington
Tuad Damonn Washington — Petitioner
Tuad Damonn Washington — Petitioner