Does the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S. Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825, create a categorical bar against the application of the Parole Board's policies to juvenile offenders?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; : 1, d¢ ‘ (ol eheats foes Fue U.S, J lyg Fot bone. ce«urt's hol fay i ‘ Ue Fleridg 176 L.Ed, 2d 625, Dealia sy WhTA Fuven fie ; Offinder ordetes ,palce apply re sae Oarele Roard fe Cetd y 5 5 Does Thee Uys, Suprem—~ Cer SUNin y \n @rahan ly . filer dg, TH L, Fed, 2d 20 Creare SUP Septenr L,Berry pA reres 7 Gnd Quw Srectrss PETG; Aya 5 pe arhtndes, Whe Comm pyed the,> Cr,mrs asa Wu ta fe pa faret«.f oar d POE’ eed. 5 S O60 The prevada farove froard yen y perp sener Of PA 24M fa 5 fl oppor Tun ry fe ch Tala Releace, a x DD O4 Yin 5 Aye Yo arol?é rv peapert ly, and new Basing thelr Deve speq oA GrewsG, Ma ete, pf, Or Regab lrarier undeg The US, Says reer Ceartl Iheld Gs in Colahan Vi Fler da, (7&4 lb, Ef 2d 25 . jil