Jameel Simpson v. James Erkerd, et al.
HabeasCorpus
Petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel due to conflict of interest
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED: ; ; 1. PETITIONER JAMEEL SIMPSON WAS DENIED HIS RIGHTS UNDER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF ’ COUNSEL IN THAT TRIAL COUNSEL HAD A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WHICH SHOULD HAVE : PRECLUDED HIM FROM REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER AND WHICH PREJUDICIALLY IMPACTED . "PETITIONER'S ABILITY TO PRESENT A DEFENSE. 2. PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS RIGHTS UNDER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED : STATES CONSTITUTION, TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR NUMEROUS FAILURES _ BY COUNSEL THUS DENYING PETITIONER THIS VALUED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. _ . 3. PETITIONER IS ACTUALLY INNOCENT AND WAS WRONGFULLY CONVICTED. : : . [iii] Foo oy . . :