S. R. v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, et al.
Whether the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals erred in reversing the lower court's decision in favor of the petitioner
No question identified. : T kurarip of my Grandsar oe reversed TC belreve-. he decision Was based on [iés. The jacige Was DlaSed be coLuse che presided ver Iny sounds Uarges 5 believe that ae Should Nave recused herself Lam my ase, Lb have at+acned +he +rangei pt where. She talks about My exchustand which was Lompletely relevent tomy. case. T am. aski Porm Grandson 700e rer ned-+o me immedZek fot cohvemn nthe environment Frat he 'S int with his paternal Grandmother. She arinks nicoho| and takes Mi. M. around fe mon not molested ner when sne WAS & child. Tam asking er aN appro 6 be granted eased aise on the LO(eme. justices SP West cginia were operat ng under Halidulert aoks and Same of hieno Wer dismissed rom thew posirion. Judge Jennifer Barley also presided JO Se Pen have recused hersel? wag Olosed and