No. 18-7032
Reginald L. Lomax v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act controlled-substances criminal-law drug-offense federal-drug-law federal-preemption mandatory-minimum mandatory-minimum-sentences state-criminal-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state statute criminalizing possession of 'counterfeit' controlled substances qualifies as a 'serious drug offense' under the Armed Career Criminal Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented in this case is whether, as the circuit court held, a state statute criminalizing possession of “counterfeit” controlled substances — which are not proscribed as “controlled substances” by federal drug laws — nevertheless qualifies as a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), such that a defendant previously convicted under such a statute is subject to the fifteen-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment imposed by the Act. i
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Reginald Lomax
Quin M. Sorenson — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent