No. 18-7035

Eminiano A. Reodica v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court evidentiary-hearing federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure guilty-plea motion-to-withdraw plea-withdrawal rule-11
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d) governing motions to withdraw a guilty plea establishes a liberal standard which precludes the district court from resolving factual disputes without an evidentiary hearing

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d) governing motions to withdraw a guilty plea establishes a liberal standard which precludes the district court from resolving factual disputes without an evidentiary hearing. i

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2018-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)
PetitionAppendixAppendix

Attorneys

Eminiano Reodica
Carlton Frederick Gunn — Kaye, McLane, Bednarski, and Litt, Petitioner
Carlton Frederick Gunn — Kaye, McLane, Bednarski, and Litt, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent