No. 18-7039

Alexander Ndaula v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553 5th-amendment 6th-amendment burden-of-proof constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing loss-amount sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 5th and 6th Amendments require an evidentiary hearing on disputed sentencing factors and an adequate explanation for an enhanced sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED: UL The 5th & 6th amendments to the Constitution guarantee fairness in criminal proceedings to the accused. When the verification of a sentence enhancement factor, here the loss amount, is disputed during sentencing, those fairness procedures entitled the petitioner to an evidentiary hearing where the government would have been required to corroborate, its allegations with actual evidence, as opposed to refuted naked allegations. Moreover, 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) required that the district court adequately explain the reasons for the enhanced sentence. 2

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2019)
2017-09-15
Application (17A285) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until November 16, 2017.
2017-09-08
Application (17A285) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 17, 2017 to November 16, 2017, submitted to Justice Breyer.

Attorneys

Alexander Ndaula
Alexander Ndaula — Petitioner
Alexander Ndaula — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent