Joel Marvin Munt v. Nanette Larson, et al.
DueProcess FourthAmendment Punishment Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Was Petitioner unconstitutionally denied his right to have a jury determine the facts of his case?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Was, Petitioner unconstitutionally denied his right to have a jury determine the facts of his case? 2. Can the State escape their Eighth Amendment Duty to provide Medical care simply by refusing to even try to diagnose or treat a condition and did the District Court err in not permitting Petitioner an evaluation by an outside expert. 3..Did the District Court and Court of Appeals use the incorrect standards in their decisions and erroneously granted dismissal : . and summary judgment? 4. Should the court’s mootness determination be reversed on ; remand due to Petitioner’s transfer back to OPH and the ~ State’s failure to demonstrate that the violation was not . capable of repetition? 5. Did the District Court erroneously deny petitioner’s Third Request for Counsel? ; 6. Did the District Court erroneously deny petitioner’s Second Motion to Amend? doc) Marvin Viunt . , ; i A . . :