Whether the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate Rule 60(b)(6) motion

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEALS IS INVALID BECAUSE THE DISTRICT COURT LACKED SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION TO ADJUDICATE RULE 60(b)(6) MOTION? II. WHAT REMEDY IS AVAILABLE FOR PETITIONER WHEN PRIVATE COUNSEL ATTORNEY FAILED AND.REFUSED TO FILE A TIMELY PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC? III. WHETHER WILKINS V. UNITED STATES, 441 U.S. 468 (1979) ENTITLES DEFENDANTS TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN . SEEKING REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC? . ai .