No. 18-7080
Yusufu Danmola v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitution constitution-law constitutional-interpretation court-jurisdiction criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-enforcement separation-of-powers standing statutory-interpretation uniform-commercial-code
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment SecondAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess FourthAmendment SecondAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Court Allowed to Enforce a Law not in Pursuance with the Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW (1) Is the Court Allowed to Enforce a Law not in Pursuance with the Constitution? (2) Are The People Prohibited Liberty Of Usage of the Uniform Commercial Code in the Criminal Court?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent