No. 18-7082
Juan Bautista Rosas Cuellar v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure collateral-estoppel criminal-defendant due-process intervening-change-in-law intervening-law-change issue-preclusion legal-doctrine offensive-preclusion summary-reversal
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May collateral estoppel be applied offensively against a criminal defendant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. May collateral estoppel ever be applied offensively against a criminal defendant, to bar him from relitigating an issue resolved in a previous case? IL Even if collateral estoppel may sometimes be applied offensively against a criminal defendant, does it bar the defendant from relitigating an issue as to which there has been an intervening change in the law? i
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Juan Bautista Rosas Cuellar
Kayla Gassmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Kayla Gassmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent