No. 18-7084
Anthony Steven Young v. United States
Tags: abuse-of-discretion child-pornography close-scrutiny criminal-sentencing district-court-discretion internet-access relevant-conduct sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review ussg-2g2.2
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity
Environmental SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What standard of review applies to the district court's decision to use the guideline for receiving or distributing child pornography to sentence a child pornography offender convicted of accessing the Internet with intent to view images of child pornography?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. What standard of review applies to the district court’s decision to use the guideline for receiving or distributing child pornography to sentence a child pornography offender convicted of accessing the Internet with intent to view images of child pornography—abuse of discretion or close scrutiny? il
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Anthony Young
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent