No. 18-709

Maria Bentley, et al. v. Victoria Vooys, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-law cost-bond due-process equal-protection equal-protection-clause judicial-procedure non-resident-plaintiff privileges-and-immunities privileges-and-immunities-clause rational-basis-review security-bond virgin-islands
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a statute requiring a non-resident plaintiff to post a security bond for costs violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause or the Equal Protection Clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Located more than one thousand miles off the coast of mainland United States, defendants who reside in the Virgin Islands may struggle to collect awarded costs against off-island plaintiffs. Cognizant of this potential burden, the Virgin Islands legislature enacted Section 547, which mandates: [i]f the plaintiff resides out of the Virgin Islands or is a foreign corporation, the defendant may serve a notice requiring security for the costs which may be awarded against the plaintiff. After the service of such a notice, all proceedings in the action shall be stayed until security is given by the plaintiff. 5 V.LC. § 547(a). The question presented is: Whether a statute requiring a court, upon a defendant’s request, to order a non-resident plaintiff to post a minimal security bond for costs violates either the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, Section 2 of the United States Constitution or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-04-02
Reply of petitioners Maria Bentley, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-03-19
Brief of respondents Victoria Vooys, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-02-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 19, 2019.
2019-02-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 19, 2019 to March 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-17
Response Requested. (Due February 19, 2019)
2019-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-28
Waiver of right of respondents Victoria Vooys, et al. to respond filed.
2018-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 31, 2018)

Attorneys

Maria Bentley, et al.
Stephen Louis BragaUniversity of Virginia School of Law, Petitioner
Stephen Louis BragaUniversity of Virginia School of Law, Petitioner
Victoria Vooys, et al.
Rhea Regina LawrenceLee J. Rohn and Associates, LLC, Respondent
Rhea Regina LawrenceLee J. Rohn and Associates, LLC, Respondent