Whether the Florida Supreme Court dismissal of mandamus conflicts with this court's decisions in Schlagenhauf v. Holder, Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. Holland, Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . J “Whether the Florida Supreme Court dismissal of mandamus conflicts with this court's decisions in Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104, 110, 85 S. Ct. 234, 13 L. Ed. 2D 152 (1964); Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 383, 74 S. Ct. 145, 98 L. Ed. 106 (1953); Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380-382, 124 S. Ct. 2576, 159 L. Ed. 2D 459 (2004). 1 . “Whether such dismissal violates Petitioner's right to due process, access to courts and it is tantamount to suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus?” Missouri PR. Co. v. Clarendon Boat Oar Co., 257 U.S. 533, 535, 42 8. Ct. 210, 66 L. Ed. 354 (1922); Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 824, 828, 97 S. Ct. 1491, 52 L. Ed. 2d 72 (1977) overruled in part by Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 116 S. Ct. : 2174, 135 L..Ed. 2d 606 (1996); and Boumediene v. Bush, 533 U.S. 723, 128 S. Ct. 2229, 2240, 171 L. Ed. 2D 41 (2008). ii