No. 18-7092

Ileen Cain v. Atelier Esthetique Institute of Esthetics, Inc.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: character-damage civil-liability civil-rights defamation defamation-per-se due-process financial-prospects professional-reputation rehabilitation-act terrorism trade trade-school
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw ERISA DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented: Whether a trade school student have a trade for purposes of defamation per se 2. Threatening terrorism is a class C felony punishable by 10 years imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(c)(1)(g). Laws governing such threats were passed after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Question Presented: Without due process, whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Summary Order is in conflict with this courts preceding case law. | 3. Question presented: Whether a Plaintiff must prove actual injury by a deprivation of due process before he may recover substantial non-punitive and punitive damages under the ADA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation ACT? Americans With Disability ACT 4. When a person’s character or character trait is an essential element of a , charge, claim, or defense, the character or trait may also be proved by relevant specific instances of the person’s conduct. (Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 405). Question Presented: Whether the District Court is in conflict with Federal Rule of Evidence. 5. When a_ hearsay statement or a _ statement described in Rule has been admitted in evidence, the declarant’s credibility may be attacked, and then supported, by any evidence that would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. Question Presented: Whether the admittance of hearsay is creditable testimony absent testimony of the declarant prior to trial during trial or an ___ administrative hearing. 6. Preservation of error is fundamental prior to and after trial. Question presented: Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals is in conflict with the 2003 amendment to §90.104, 1

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-28
Waiver of right of respondent Atelier Esthetique Institute of Esthetics to respond filed.
2018-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2019)
2018-09-12
Application (18A250) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until December 15, 2018.
2018-09-03
Application (18A250) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 16, 2018 to December 15, 2018, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.

Attorneys

Atelier Esthetique Institute of Esthetics
Nicole FederL'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, LLP, Respondent
Nicole FederL'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, LLP, Respondent
Ileen Cain
Ileen Cain — Petitioner
Ileen Cain — Petitioner