No. 18-7097
IFP
Tags: bond-case bond-v-united-states civil-rights collateral-review constitutional-law due-process federalism habeas-corpus new-rule retroactivity standing supreme-court
Key Terms:
Antitrust HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Antitrust HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Supreme Court's decision in Bond v. United States establish a new rule of constitutional law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Supreme Court's decision in Bond v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2355, 180 L. Ed. 2d 269, decided June 16, 2011 (hereinafter "Bond I"), establish a "new rule of constitutional law"? ; 2. If so, should the new rule of constitutional law announced in Bond v. United States, supra, be made retroactive to cases on collateral review?
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-10-26
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.