No. 18-7099

Richard Allen Ratushny v. Kevin Kauffman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: Brady-v-Maryland brady-violation conflict-of-interest crimen-falsi due-process right-to-counsel sixth-amendment welfare-fraud
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the petitioner denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WAS THE PETITIONER DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL , : : WHERE DEFENSE COUNSEL THAT REPRESENTED PETITIONER SIMULTANEOUSLY AND A POTENTIAL DEFENSE WITNESS-IN PETITIONER'S CASE-RESULTED ; IN AN ACTUAL/OBVIOUS CONFLICT OF INTEREST ? ; 2. DID THE PROSECUTOR VIOLATE PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS , AND COMMIT A BRADY V. MARYLAND VIOLATION BY FAILING TO DISCLOSE EVIDENCE THAT THE VICTIM'S MOTHER, WHO WAS BOTH A PROSECUTION : . STAR WITNESS AND THE INITIAL COMPLAINANT, HAD RECENTLY BEEN CONVICTED OF WELFARE FRAUD, A CRIMEN FALSI ? : 2 (iiil]

Docket Entries

2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2018-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Richard Allen Ratushny
Richard Allen Ratushny — Petitioner
Richard Allen Ratushny — Petitioner