No. 18-7104
Axel Irizarry-Rosario v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process government-misconduct government-obligation government-obligations judicial-ethics plea-agreement plea-bargaining prosecutorial-discretion sentencing sentencing-argument statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government may avoid its obligation to scrupulously observe the terms of a plea agreement by including in its sentencing argument information not relevant to the crime for which the sentence is being imposed?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED May the government avoid its obligation to scrupulously observe the terms of a plea agreement by including in its sentencing argument information not relevant to the crime for which the sentence is being imposed?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2018-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Axel Irizarry-Rosario
Richard B. Klibaner — Klibaner & Sabino, Petitioner
Richard B. Klibaner — Klibaner & Sabino, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent