Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco v. United States
Whether the District Court Erred When it Declared, Petitioner Breached His 2011 Plea Agreement and Thus Allowed the Government to go Forward on Charges that were Dismissed in 2011 Pursuant to the Plea Agreement?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether the District Court Erred When it Declared, Petitioner Breached His 2011 Plea Agreementand Thus Allowed the Government “ ‘to go Forward on Charges that were Dismissed in 2011 Pursuant to + the Plea Agreement? 2) Whether The District Court Imposed.a Substantively Unreasonable Sentence ? ; : 3) Was Petitioner Falsely Convicteds& Of. : the Commerce commercial Bond ‘interest, Creditor, Credit,Business, ; Strawman 31 U.S.C.S 5118(B) (2) (a) (C) (1) Judicial Power, In “Violation of the Eleventh Admendment of th United States Constitution? . 7 ;