No. 18-7106

Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal breach breach-of-contract commerce-clause constitutional-violation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process eleventh-amendment judicial-power plea-agreement sentencing
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court Erred When it Declared, Petitioner Breached His 2011 Plea Agreement and Thus Allowed the Government to go Forward on Charges that were Dismissed in 2011 Pursuant to the Plea Agreement?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether the District Court Erred When it Declared, Petitioner Breached His 2011 Plea Agreementand Thus Allowed the Government “ ‘to go Forward on Charges that were Dismissed in 2011 Pursuant to + the Plea Agreement? 2) Whether The District Court Imposed.a Substantively Unreasonable Sentence ? ; : 3) Was Petitioner Falsely Convicteds& Of. : the Commerce commercial Bond ‘interest, Creditor, Credit,Business, ; Strawman 31 U.S.C.S 5118(B) (2) (a) (C) (1) Judicial Power, In “Violation of the Eleventh Admendment of th United States Constitution? . 7 ;

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco
Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco — Petitioner
Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent