No. 18-7107

Naeem-Lateef Odums v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment-due-process,6th-amendment-right-to-c 5th-amendment-due-process,sentencing-discretion,me 6th-amendment attorney-client-privilege criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel intentional-deception mental-health-evaluation sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does it violate the 6th Amendment right to effective-assistance-of-counsel when a defendant's lawyer intentionally-deception

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does it violate the 6th Amendment Constitutional right to ; effective assistance of counsel when a defendant's lawyer . intentionally, willfully and knowingly deceives his client in order to expedite the case? 2. Does it violate the 5th Amendment constitutional right to Due Process when a sentencing judge abuses their discretion in order to sentence a defendant without a mental health evaluation after the court recognized the need for one? 3. Does it violate the 5th Amendment constitutional right and 6th Amendment right when counsel discloses client attorney — : privileged communications that negatively effect the outcome ’ for the sentencing process? NW

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Naeem L. Odums
Naeem-Lateef Odums Sr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent