No. 18-7109
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-charging criminal-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process juror-consensus jury-consensus ohio-constitution rape-allegations united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is 'carbon copy' charging of multiple allegations of rape violative of due process and/or double jeopardy pursuant to the United States and Ohio Constitution and/or violative of due process under Article I, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I Is “carbon copy” charging of multiple allegations of rape violative of due process and/or double jeopardy pursuant to the United States and Ohio Constitution and/or violative of due process under Article |, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution? iF Does “carbon copy” charging of multiple allegations of rape violate a defendant’s due process rights as to juror consensus? . . .
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-15
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio to respond filed.
2018-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Ohio
Ralph Michael Rivera — Mahoning County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Ralph Michael Rivera — Mahoning County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent