No. 18-7119
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-justice criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process excessive-sentence judicial-error jurisdiction louisiana-law sentencing sentencing-review subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Louisiana Court's have erred in determining that the sentence was not excessive?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUES TION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the Louisiana Court's have erred in determining that the sentence was not excessive? 2. Whether the Louisiana Court's have erred in failing to note the District Court did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to prosecute the case-in-chief? 3. Did the State of Louisiana have subject-matter jurisdiction to prosecute in accords with the law? 2
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-18
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2018-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Louisiana
Stacy L. Wright — East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney, Respondent
Stacy L. Wright — East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney, Respondent