Has the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied this Court's ruling in Carpenter v. United States regarding cell phone records being Constitutionally protected under the Fourth Amendment?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Has the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied this Court's ruling in Carpenter v. United States (138 S.Ct. 2206, 2217, 2220 (2018)) regarding cell phone records being Constitutionally protected under the Fourth Amendment, and instead deferring to the District Court's discretion and "decision not to suppress evidence seized after a search of historical cell cite records" over Petitioner's Constitutional rights defined in Carpenter that are not subject to the District Court's discretion? 2. Has the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals begun to establish a precedential stare decisis beginning with United States v. Chavez,(No. 16-4499), 894 F.3d 593 (4th Cir. 2018), and continuing through Petitioner's case that splits the Fourth Circuit from the other Circuits respective to the correct application of Carpenter? . 3. Should Chavez be granted Certiorari, is Petitioner's case similarly situated enough so as to warrant Certiorari, despite Petitioner's pro se instant 4. Should Chavez not be granted Certiorari, is Petitioner's case sufficiently attenuated or unique enough to warrant Certiorari, despite Petitioner's pro se instant Petition shortcomings? : -i,