Whether La. RS32:863 of the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Law is unconstitutional for due process of law

Questions Presented For Review | . . | 1. . | Whether La. .RS32:863 of the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Safety Resp= bnsibility Law is unconstitutional for due process of law in terms of Mullane v Gentral Hanover Bank & Trust Co.,339 U.S. 306, 318 (1950); and Mathews v Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976), | where it requires incarcerated persons to maintain automotive ' insurance coverage from behind bars ox to surrender vehicle | plates at OMV locations from behind bars to avoid sanctions unger the statute? : . Il. In stating .a valid Section 1983 retaliation claim against super, . visory officials sufficient at-least to an extent which would raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of it, Bell Atlantic v Twombly, 550 U.S. 544,556 (2007); | Asheroft v_Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009), whether it is suf+ ficient if the factual content allows a court to draw a reasona-| ble inference that the identified defendant can be located in a | group of similarly-situated unidentified individuals?’ ~| : Whether an amended complaint giving placeholder "Doe" names for defendants can relate back to the original complaint under the | Mistake" provision of Rule 15 (c)(1)(C), Fed.R.Civ.P.? | , Parties : The Petitioner is Mark Hanna, a state prisoner in the Wade Cor| tectional Center in Homer, Louisiana. The Respondents, not all \ _hamed on the cover page, are Janes LeBlanc, secretary, Louisiana | ! . : ' : Co a | | | i Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections ; Louisiana Dept. of Publ. ié Safety and Corrections ; Louisiana Office of Motor Vehicles. | .