No. 18-7137

Jamie R. Madrigal v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2018-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidence ineffective-assistance res-judicata statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

May withholding exculpatory and impeaching evidence be disregarded and/or used to obtain or sustain a conviction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented for Review: I.) May withholding exculpatory and impeaching evidence [in violation of Brady (373 U.S. 83, '63) /Due Process as Guaranteed under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution] be disregarded and/or used to obtain or sustain a conviction? II.) May court-appointed [trial] counsel's failure to investigate (a) discovery and/or (b) the requisite authority applicable to the proceedings he was appointed to [in violation of Due Process and Effective Assistance as Guaranteed under the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution] be disregarded to sustain a conviction obtained therefrom? III.) May the misapplication of the doctrine of res judicata to a question of law /interpretation of statute requiring de novo review [in violation of Due Process and Equal Protection under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution] be disregarded to sustain a void judgment? . IV.) May a lower court's disregard of statutory requirements /authority rendering both the attempted judgment void and the doctrine of res judicata inapplicable [in violation of Due Process and Equal Protection of the law under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution] be disregarded to sustain a void judgment? : (ii-)

Docket Entries

2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2018-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Jamie Madrigal
Jamie Madrigal — Petitioner
Jamie Madrigal — Petitioner