No. 18-7152
IFP
Tags: commerce-clause criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-power federal-prosecution firearm-possession firearms intrastate intrastate-commerce legal-authority possession second-amendment standing supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional because it exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, and is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate possession of a firearm and ammunition?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional because it exceeds Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause, and is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate possession of a firearm and ammunition? i
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-01
Reply of petitioner Yosnel Bonet filed.
2019-02-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-01-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 21, 2019.
2019-01-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2019 to February 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Yosnel Bonet
M. Allison Guagliardo — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner