No. 18-7154
John Visconti v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: boulware-precedent boulware-v-united-states corporate-fraud corporate-governance corporate-stock criminal-law criminal-procedure distribution-interpretation legal-classification return-of-capital securities-law shareholder-rights statutory-interpretation stock-distribution tax-evasion unlawful-diversion
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an unlawful diversion may be deemed a 'distribution . . . with respect to [a corporation's] stock,' the question expressly left open in Boulware v. United States, 552 U.S. 421, 439 (2008)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether an unlawful diversion may be deemed a “distribution . . . with respect to [a corporation’s] stock,” the question expressly left open in Boulware v. United States, 552 U.S. 421, 439 (2008). --prefix-
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)
Attorneys
John Visconti
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent