No. 18-7157
Cody Wayne Mayfield v. Jimmy Martin, Warden
IFP
Tags: clearly-established-law deferential-review due-process estelle-v-mcguire federal-claim federal-law habeas-corpus standard-of-review state-court state-court-adjudication supreme-court-precedent unreasonable-application
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether deferential treatment is given when a state court's adjudication of a federal claim is not merely unreasonable, but too involved an incorrect application of the clearly established federal law as determined by the United States Supreme Court in Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether deferential treatment is given when a state court’s adjudication of a federal claim is not merely unreasonable, but too involved an incorrect application of the clearly established federal law as determined by the United States Supreme Court in Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991).
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2018-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)