No. 18-7158
Tony Knox v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process federal-question federal-questions judicial-review legal-standard novel-claim procedural-default statutory-vagueness unconstitutional vague-statute
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent
DueProcess Patent
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did The State Court Decide Important Federal Questions In A Way That Conflicts With Relevant Decisions Of This Court, such as: (1) A Vague Statute Was Not Deemed Unconstitutional?; and (2) A Novel Claim Does Not Show Cause To Excuse A Procedural Default?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1. Did The State Court Decide Important Federal Questions In A Way That Conflicts With Relevant Decisions Of This Court, Such As: (1) A Vague Statute Was Not Deemed Unconstitutional?; and (2) A Novel Claim Does Not Show Cause To Excuse A Procedural Default?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent Harold Clarke to respond filed.
2018-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Harold Clarke
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent