Andrew Mark Lamar v. John O'Dell, Colorado Parole Board Member
Whether reasonable tourists would find the district court's resolution of petitioner's due process claim debatable or wrong with respect to extending a liberty interest in discretionary parole release hearings following expiration of lower-end sentence for purposes of according adequate review procedures
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED To | QUETMER FEASONWBLE TURISTS WeUld FISD TNE OsrRicr SoURT s BESOCUTION) OF PETITIONLE RSS Due PRAGESS Gaim DEBAWBLE aR WRONG Whit RESPECT TH EXTENDING A LIBERTY INTEREST IN DISCRETION ARY PAROVE “RELEASE HEARINGS FOLLOWING ExPrRAT ON QF WWER-END SENTENCE FOR PURPOSAS CFE ACCORDING ADEQUATE RENIEN RRSGEDURES 8n0 > TH WHEMER REQSDNOADVE TURISTS WoUID FIND Whe OSTRIT SURT'S BESOLVTION OF PETITIONERS cOTENTION mar ME WIRD SRANT WOLDING IND Rieck v. PeHer, 631 £2] — 232 C28 Gr /1So), SYOULD BE FRUSWED WERE, THUS RECONALLINIG SPITS DENNEN GRCUITS, PEBSTABYE URONG ? i. .