Whether the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated when his trial counsel failed to investigate and present exculpatory evidence

No question identified. : “KAMHAGIE ATMO Wy 'QLIWA 160d K¥ FLUIOIN 'yAqQnzAIO KIS U SH UILSTIFY G2 INTIZGS AO ANIWATZ FH. 49 Label "19W MOTLWMZGTAIN FHA UPUMN HO Sand LUHL PIUWHI FHL SX (A) —~ gPLTRTHONS 199° OIE |) tuts 25407 WRONN 8M O2DUd ASO XP PHL PIWIOIA HSMN Va LUNA OL SAUD (OED MPLS INEIMAANIS NHI S F9UNE QNTIMPANTG FHA MOowd UFNIaWATI DHL F700 (sg) “2 OMOTRS Wd, SSUID UST LE “ood yo 0Q Nes AL FSNUIRY ‘SUPe -MNF#IFO X27 HENNd OL AMIANZT SAYNLWMISTIAT FHA MTOHE ‘4319 (1) UNE "(u) (1) '3suaT?Y C4 HOLAd anewynory ve-OF-S1 FINO? 5704 Ch). TTLNTILANZ PHL SOAYURNO BL AITIAR IAZAINNG UHOWMS SH tr YOS MSINNd LSE au FHIS WY ‘asodynd YLT yor ~ CON) @ny2 QOC-M =~ $1 ¢g FIO) NE ANPLNE SPLUAS 5,FYMLSTIAT IHL VX CE) “TY STIAG CL LIWCA OH) 'S-S-WEIE 2007 40 250¢YNA YOH A PMOTIA yD, SSUID # NorLYtOorAN ANH ONIN LY “sa waUeSITNnd SO SNUFM TH NOTLZQUUA HW PATOANE CUNDUOSHD FHA F709 CE) -"S,CIUT QLPUA ASOD V7 “MOITLIALWONY 19 ‘Olg LT AUY “LSNo2 NUUTGZS FHL FLATOTA (CHMIVOSH) yoga SUPINIISO XI5 HSIN UPHLUNA OL ANZLNE STUNLUISTIIT swMmysdtu £3707 (17 "39707 2TGUUDNOH SIL NI NQLLHNIWYALID PLULAFMWZ FIINGAY O21. WN PITATUAd TLUATIAdAU TUWAOM WOU NOZLUTAIY LATASNE OA SU CUNI¥OSA) WII SIIUNZIIO XIS SO BAY AHL GNAZIZTD DIUM d FHL OL PINUAAIAWE Hons’ Sx tWIdd SZHL Ga.1LN3S4ud (S)NOILSSNO