Whether it is First and Fourteenth Constitutional Amendment violations for a Family Court in State to deny a parent visitation with her children because she is incarcerated and whether this implies Troxel v Granville, 527 U.S. 1069, 144 L.Ed.2d 842, 120 S.Ct. 11 (1999)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW , ¢ Whether it is First and Fourteenth Constitutional Amendment violations for a _ : ; Family Court in State to deny a parent visitation with her children because she is incarcerated and whether this implies Troxel v Granville, 527 U.S. 1069, 144 L.Ed.2d 842, 120 S.Ct. 11 (1999)? ¢@ Whether a mother, not determined to be unfit (Troxel) and who has an , established bond with her children has a Constitutional right to maintain contact with her children while she is incarcerated? , ¢ Whether the Washington State Court of Appeals has decided an important question of federal law, which impacts millions of children and parents, that has not been, but should be, settléd by the United States Supreme Court (Rule 10.C) — noting that conflicting rulings in the lower courts abound as to whether a fit but incarcerated parent has a constitutional right to visitation with her children? Lefjeen weak & Coterar mY ;