Christopher Lipsey, Jr. v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District
Whether the ALLS role complies with the First Amendment and due process rights of individuals seeking access to the courts
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | — ALLS Role ComPleardle Feworless? : Z. Consides\aa ail Ya FochS and ew does Unance Wova OM adesuake WanedN 2 3. Does MaaOSG\ access ko Ww Courks C2MW\KT OM\oask A WAC agd will Oc 5 LoWapnos Sane O@ Seance, O€ WD \WAWidva) 2 Ni LS Awe Coloma ARO Peodcak We Moree ARE ADK ” . | 5. WA Ne CAR and Courk o& Ai@ead lawacis LRAT Convack Mains PLaaMake diteck of Peal COAKEModdon Yolds AUS allowina a Recto vARKzallaaw Lik ArCessart) ke War california SOVCMNY Cover and UWS. Disisiak Courk onck MAO CArcu \? . Yo. WA Ade Skode Avlal Courks cownise Wis (Plaid CRRAMGAE OkkoCne Will roadie ae issues WL Sous AD VAS O& saencina \sind War Shake of CalifOral a xD oNT Wose ChaiwrS board? ° “T. ES Wowace Comm®laink Secioos ercoan . for AW Wat Couck XD Kole WS (Porkanle ¥ i” . QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | X® \e heard Cor Bw Wace iwkeresk as well? | SB, LS Anak enkdlead ko on Shee. IF soy Whok Couse OF ACKoON \S Woke KE wok & ALYSG. AWB? > Y A, XS. Wacken uv. Courk of AREA and Laals Ve GaSet Ww Gontick wit BOD OAK 2 e XS CoMKORnia Cormenk diveck areal Gctem MAAING TACT Close on Aiveck O&Peal look Worladsla, Ascektonatt OW Co\lok®ra\ oto AWK Win one Wand lock Aakings wn ng, Ones Conskoe onal 2 Y