No. 18-7181

Antonio Amar White v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: dismissed-conduct district-court due-process judge-found-facts sentencing sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-violation unreasonable-sentence
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner's sentence violated the Sixth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether Petitioner’s sentence violated the Sixth Amendment because the district court’s factual findings, based on dismissed conduct, provided the legally essential predicate for an otherwise unreasonable sentence? No. In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2018 ANTONIO AMAR WHITE, Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Petitioner Antonio Amar White asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the opinion and judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on October 1, 2018.

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2019)

Attorneys

Antonio White
Kristin L. DavidsonFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kristin L. DavidsonFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent