No. 18-7183
Christopher Jude Martin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: consequential-damages criminal-law criminal-valuation damages enhancements evidence legal-damages property-damage restitution restitution-order sufficiency-of-evidence valuation
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was sufficient evidence that the value of the items at the time that Mr. Martin damaged them was over $1,000?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Whether there was sufficient evidence that the value of the items at the time that Mr. Martin damaged them was over $1,000? B. Whether Mr. Martin should be held accountable for a restitution order which may have included consequential damages and enhancements? 1
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Christopher Jude Martin
Ashwini Mate — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Ashwini Mate — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent