No. 18-7194

Brandon Lee Colbert v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2018-12-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: batson batson-challenge impartial-jury jury-selection peremptory-challenge police-misconduct race-neutral race-neutral-reason sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury permit the reviewing court, at Batson's first stage, to conclude that a minority venire member's negative experience with police is a race-neutral reason for the state's peremptory challenge when the venire member insists that, despite that experience, she will be impartial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED A United States Department of Justice investigation concluded that law enforcement in defendant’s community systemically engages in racist police practices. Does the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury permit the reviewing court, at Batson’s first stage, to conclude that a minority venire member’s negative experience with police is a race-neutral reason for the state’s peremptory challenge when the venire member insists that, despite that experience, she will be impartial? 2

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent People of the State of California to respond filed.
2018-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2019)

Attorneys

Brandon Lee Colbert
Mary Josephine StrnadLaw Office of Mary Jo Strnad, Petitioner
Mary Josephine StrnadLaw Office of Mary Jo Strnad, Petitioner
People of the State of California
Rene JudkiewiczCalifornia Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Rene JudkiewiczCalifornia Attorney General's Office, Respondent