No. 18-7199
Adelmo A. Fauntleroy v. Virginia
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-counsel incarceration ineffective-assistance-of-counsel reasonable-doubt right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court have sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convict the petitioner under the Sixth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1). Did the Court have sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convict the petitioner under the Sixth Amendment by the U.S.A. 2).Was the lower court's Conviction insufficient as a matter of Law by the standarts of Due Process of Law. 3). Wheather one has been currently incarcerated for long or short term. Are his right's Constitutionally protected. 4). Was Counsel for the petitioner Affective under the Sixth Amendment right to Counsel. | . | __
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
2018-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Virginia
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent