No. 18-7208
Nicholas Maslonka v. Noah Nagy, Warden
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constructive-denial critical-stage cronic-standard cronic-v-united-states habeas-corpus right-to-counsel sixth-amendment state-action
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is there a requirement that state action contribute to counsel's absence from a critical stage of the proceedings in order for there to be a constructive denial of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel under Cronic v. United States?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Is there a requirement that state action contribute to counsel’s absence from a critical stage of the proceedings in order for there to be a constructive denial of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel under Cronic v. United States? 2. Did the Court of Appeals suspend the writ of habeas corpus by limiting the remand in this matter. ii
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-08
Reply of petitioner Nicholas Maslonka filed. (Distributed)
2019-04-26
Brief of respondent Noah Nagy, Warden in opposition filed.
2019-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 26, 2019.
2019-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 27, 2019 to April 26, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-25
Response Requested. (Due March 27, 2019)
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2018-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Nicholas Maslonka
Noah Nagy, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent