Neil Gillespie v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
SocialSecurity Antitrust DueProcess Securities Privacy
Is the federal HECM reverse mortgage program unconstitutional?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is the federal HECM reverse mortgage program unconstitutional? This petition . ' challenges the constitutionality of the federal Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program [12 USC § 1715z-20; 24 CFR Part 206] called a HECM reverse mortgage, for lack of due process . under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, void for vagueness, void under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and buyer incompetence. 2. Is The Florida Bar, as an “arm” of the Supreme Court of Florida, unconstitutional? This . petition challenges the constitutionality of The Florida Bar, a private unincorporated association, ; created by Petition of Florida State Bar Ass'n, 40 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1949), a lawyers guild, to act . as an integrated or unified bar, and the so-called disciplinary arm of the Florida Supreme Court, : to serve “as an advocate and intermediary for attorneys, the court, and the public”, without a ; separation or wall between lawyer guild functions, disciplinary functions, and the public. 3. Does HUD have jurisdiction to decide a contested residential home foreclosure of a federal Home Equity Conversion Mortgage [12 USC § 1715z-20; 24 CFR Part 206] also called a HECM reverse mortgage? Do the courts have jurisdiction, and if so, the federal or state courts? . 4. Is nonlawyer ownership of a law firm constitution? Is the law firm McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company, lawfully operating in Florida when none of its named partners are members of The Florida Bar, and its only manager shown on its 2018 Foreign Limited Liability Company Annual Report, is not a member of The Florida Bar? 5. Does the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantee the right to a trial by jury in a state court residential home foreclosure of a federal Home Equity Conversion . Mortgage [12 USC § 1715z-20; 24 CFR Part 206] also called a HECM reverse mortgage? 6. Are statues or rules that nullify the “inviolate” right to trial by jury in Florida unconstitutional? Fla. Const., Art. 1, sec. 22 “Trial by jury. The right of trial by jury shall be secure to all and remain inviolate. The qualifications and the number of jurors, not fewer than six, shall be fixed by law.” 7. Does an indigent and disabled homeowner age 61+ have a right to assistance of counsel “ in home foreclosure on a federal HECM reverse mortgage under the federal Older Americans Act, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 35 Programs For Older Americans, for old age, and disability, including type 2 diabetes, post traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, and a speech disorder? 8. Did Judge Craggs’ medical exam of me November 28, 2016 in open court, and misdiagnosis, amount to the unlicensed practice of medicine? Judge Craggs denied me counsel under all available options for the non-jury trial July 18, 2017 resulting in serious illness to me during the trial requiring ambulance transport the Ocala Regional Medical Center. : 9. Can the Civil Rights Division, Voting Section, U.S. Department of Justice ignore the enclosed Voting Section complaint against Florida’s rigged judicial elections? . Fla. Const., Art. V, Sec. 10(b)(1) “The election of circuit judges shall be preserved”; Art. V1, Sec. 1. Regulation of elections. “All elections by the people shall be by direct and secret vote”. Ballotpedia reported “Unopposed races and the practice of post-dating judicial resignations to block elections highlighted questions about the role of democracy in Florida's circuit and county judicial seats in the 2016 election cycle. Only the 60 opposed seats out of the total 252 seats up for election on these courts saw a vote on August 30, 2016. All unopposed candidates were automatically elected without ever appearing on a ballot or facing a public vote.” . ' 10. Can the U.S. Department of Justice deny on May 18, 2017 my FOIA into the mental : health screening imposed by the Florida Supreme Court on bar applicants, because the records you have requested pertain