No. 18-7228
Dashawn D. Brown v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-sufficiency excited-utterance excited-utterances hearsay hearsay-evidence prior-identification residual-hearsay-exception sentencing sentencing-error supervised-release
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sentencing court erred in admitting hearsay statements as excited utterances
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. WHETHER THE SENTENCING COURT ERRED IN ADMITTING HEARSAY STATEMENTS AS EXCITED UTTERANCES. 2. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN ADMITTING HEARSAY STATEMENTS AS PRIOR IDENTIFICATION. 3. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT THE RESIDUAL HEARSAY EXCEPTION WOULD BE APPLICABLE, EVEN IF THE EXCITED UTTERANCE AND PRIOR IDENTIFICATIN EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT APPLICABLE. 4. WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS SUFFICIENT TO FIND THAT THE DEFENDANT COMMITTED A CRIME IN VIOLATION OF HIS TERMS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE. i
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Dashawn D. Brown
Charles Arthur Gavin — Cawthorn, Deskevich & Gavin, P.C., Petitioner
Charles Arthur Gavin — Cawthorn, Deskevich & Gavin, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent