No. 18-7235
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: brady-doctrine due-process exculpatory-evidence fourteenth-amendment investigative-agencies kyles-v-whitley prosecutorial-disclosure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Arizona follows the rule of Kyles v. Whitley requiring prosecutors to investigate and disclose exculpatory evidence from all participating investigative agencies in accordance with the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Arizona follows the rule of Kyles v. Whitley requiring prosecutors to investigate and disclose exculpatory evidence from all participating investigative agencies in accordance with the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. i
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Motion for leave to file brief in opposition with the appendix under seal GRANTED.
2019-04-15
Motion for leave to file reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record GRANTED.
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-26
Motion for leave to file reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed by petitioner.
2019-03-08
Brief of respondent State of Arizona in opposition filed.
2019-03-08
Motion for leave to file brief in opposition with the appendix under seal filed by respondent.
2019-01-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 8, 2019.
2019-01-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 6, 2019 to March 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-07
Motion (18M82) or leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2018-12-12
MOTION (18M82) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-01
Motion (18M82) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2018-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Jason Eugene Bush
John L. Saccoman — John L. Saccoman, Esq., Petitioner
John L. Saccoman — John L. Saccoman, Esq., Petitioner
State of Arizona
David Robert Cole — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent
David Robert Cole — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Lacey Stover Gard — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Lacey Stover Gard — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent